Health AI that answers from your sources, with the citation.
Assistants designed to retrieve answers from approved guidelines, protocols and product information, with a source on every answer. For health programmes, pharma medical teams, pharmacies and clinics.
Guidelines exist, but answers are slow.
Staff search 80-page PDFs for one dose rule. General chatbots guess, and can't tell you where an answer came from. New staff take months to get confident with the guidelines they're expected to follow.
- One answer buried in an 80-page PDF
- General chatbots that guess without a source
- New staff slow to get confident
- No way to check what an answer was based on
What gets built in a pilot.
Approved sources only
National and internal guidelines, protocols and product information, agreed with you before the build starts.
A citation on every answer
Each answer shows the document and section it came from, so staff can check it.
Accuracy testing before launch
Tested against real questions, including ones the source doesn't cover, where the right answer is that the source doesn't say.
Staff onboarding and refreshers
A faster way for new and existing staff to find and revise the rules they work to.
Built for these teams.
Start small. Prove it. Then grow.
Map the workflow
A 30-minute call on how the work runs today. Who reports what, where it goes, and where it gets stuck.
Find the bottleneck
Usually one or two points where visibility breaks, not the whole operation. That's where we start.
Run a paid pilot
2 to 4 weeks on one region, product line or team, with what counts as success agreed in writing first.
Scale what works
Roll out to more regions or teams only once the pilot has shown results.
Common questions.
Will it give clinical advice to patients?
It's designed for care teams and staff working from approved sources. Clinical decisions remain with qualified professionals.
What if the guideline doesn't cover the question?
It says so, rather than guessing. That behaviour is tested before launch.
Can it use our internal protocols?
Yes. Internal documents can be sources alongside national guidelines, agreed in the scope.
How do you check accuracy?
Each pilot includes accuracy checks against real questions and tests for questions the sources don't support.
More of what I build.
Tell me what you're trying to track.
A few lines about your workflow is enough, without patient names or medical details. I'll reply within two working days with either a time for a call or an honest "this isn't the right fit".